This night though, we brought eggs. 12 of them. In a carton. And I don't care that, in writing this, I've just broken a bunch of rules of grammar grossly. It is what it is. We brought eggs. Not wine (we did have a bottle on hand and although it was out on the counter ready to go, the eggs won the day because we decided to be iconoclasts - that's this Aries thing kickin' in - bringin' the eggs!), but eggs. These eggs were not a dozen of the store bought variety. No, we weren't that weird. These were brown, organic (whatever the **** that means these days) eggs, from free (as free as Rhode Island red and black hens can be in a henhouse in the dead of a Manitoba winter in January can be) range hens that M tends all year long, on our own property! (I attribute all of this parenthetical explanational crapola to the revised New American Standard Bible* that I read as a 16 year old, which reveled in the hyper-layers of explanation long before hyper-text, and in which it took damn near an hour to read John 14. Ah, those were the formative days.)
Yes. Eggs. Brown ones. No wine. We showed up with eggs. The eggs that M had collected that morning from the very chickens that had, not more than 24 hours ago held inside their "beings". These eggs were, as they say, the shit. So it goes.
Still, we drank the wine that the others brought. We ate the crackers and cheese. The dips. The chips. The choco-whatchamacallits. But that didn't change the fact that when we got home we had a dozen fewer eggs in the house, and one more bottle of wine than I'd expected, because one of us suggested that we could be unique - different - and bring eggs to the hors d' oeuvres party.
Yup! You can see that Aries shiznat kickin' in I tellz ya. It's gonna be crazy over here for a few weeks before things settle out! You just watch.
Ride report
in: -15'C wind 10 ks SE
out: -14'C wind 15 ks NNW
(another near perfect day - except for the abundance of fresh snow, which made it superb!)
*I've been reminded by my bro (see comments) that the version I read was the Amplified Bible (a version of the NASB).
2 comments:
Sweet - oeufs at an hors d' oeuvres party! - But I especially like your sidebar on the NASB - do you remember the Amplified Bible?
http://www.lockman.org/amplified/
I used to read that one at the till while waiting for customers/closing at the book store.
Also, when I looked at the whole astrological re-structuring thing (thanks for the tip, by the way), I found that I am still a Sagittarius. Oh well. I guess that's why I didn't feel any great cosmic shift.
I also really appreciate your disclaimer regarding grammar - that really takes the pressure off of us wannabe copy editors.
Tim.
Thanks for the memory jar Tim. I was in fact thinking of the Amplified version of the NASB. The name just escaped me. It might actually be the case that my penchant for parenthetical and run-on writing comes from enjoying my experience reading that version. The writing felt more human, and less certain. The subtext of adding possible options for phrasing, or meaning, is that the meaning is flexible and uncertain. Now that uncertainty translates itself into a style of writing that runs-on and struggles (deliberately now) to express it "right".
Jila Ghomeshi (Jian's older sister and Linguistics prof at UM) just published "Grammar Matters" which leans strongly toward taking it easy on grammar-policing. I'm sure her immigrant status (second-language, etc) helps her see "grammars" as fluid and primarily functional. Many of the rules of English grammar (and spelling) are arbitrary, capricious, and illogical. Being able to follow them well essentially denotes membership in an exclusive class of people who have had access to them, and who have had the luxury of the time to learn them. So when we're fastidious about grammar (and believe me, this is a whole helluvalot different than employing a large vocabulary), I place myself among an elite that I may actually not admire.
Grammars must serve; they must not rule.
Post a Comment