Tonight Bekah, Colby, and I set out to Winkler (it always feels odd to me to go to Winkler to see a movie) to see the second last installment of the Harry Potter saga. Having missed a few of these epics, I fell a little behind (while keeping up with Colby's roll-with-it conversations and effusions). What I get from this, overall, is that if I'm a writer, and I've got a tough plot problem to overcome, I should simply invent a new character, or spell, or potion, or special effect, and all will be well. It doesn't hurt that since it's all in wizard-land, that if your best friend gets pretty beat up in some wizardy whack-up you can depend on the girl to fix it with a potion, or her charm.
Sorry, I'm being a bit harsh, but I do not understand the appeal of these Rowling howlings much further than the lovability of Hermione and Ron. Harry is a Pippinish, arched eye-browed whiner who tells his friends he cares about them, but does selfish stuff that gets them into trouble. He's not a good friend, unless you like having friends that you continually have to get out of jams. If I was Ron (and Hermione would follow him for sure), I'd have stayed away, kept the Gryffindor sword, and started my own little side-project with the rest of the Weasleys. They're much more interesting. Especially the twins.
The ride in: Temp 15'C Wind NW 30ks
The ride home: Got a ride in order to pick up Colby and make it to the theatre on time.
1 comment:
Thank-you for your sober analysis of J.K. Rowling's cheap answers to the worlds problems. Horace once said that “There should be no god to intervene, unless the problem merits such a champion.” Maybe this is why all those Bible-thumpers tried to ban the book...nah, they just felt threatened by magic's incomprehensible answers to our problems. If wars can be fixed by magic what do we need God for?
Post a Comment